Swan Turton

Search:

spacer

legal services

latest news

spacer

Article

spacer
arrow

Article Story:

ROYALTY FREE LICENSING: LEGAL ISSUES

arrow Date: 14.01.2003

Royalty free licensing is a new commercial model.  The model is attractive to customers partly because of its simplicity.  However, like all new models there are problems and ambiguities associated with it.  In some cases the simplicity is more apparent than real.

Traditional rights protected licensing involves licensing images for specific uses for a fee based on the type of use, the duration of the licence and the territory in which publication will take place.  The fee may be fixed in advance or negotiable.  'Rights protected' is something of a misnomer: the licence will in some cases be exclusive to the customer, but very often it isn't.

Royalty free licensing involves buying licensing images on a non-exclusive basis that can be used for practically any purpose any number of times anywhere in the world and at any time.  Royalty free images are typically supplied on CD-Rom or over the internet, but the means of delivery is irrelevant.  Dover Books has for many years been supplying what are in essence royalty free images in book form.

From the customer's point of view a royalty free licence appears simple: you buy a royalty free image, it's yours to do what you like with.

In some ways though, royalty free licensing is more complicated than rights protected licensing.  Instead of paying for a specific licensed use you are paying for a very wide range of uses, but there are limits to what you can do with royalty free images and those limits are not always well defined.

You need to look at the small print in the licence agreement.

For example, if you are going to store an image on a company's network, the basic licence will probably restrict access to 10 or 12 users.  To allow more people to have access to the image you will need to extend the licence in the same way as you would with other types of software.

There will also be restrictions on how the images can be published.  A royalty free licence will not always include merchandising uses such as calendars and postcards.  You will not be able to use the image in ways which compete with the supplier of the image, for example by putting it on a web site and making it available for licensing by other people.  And an image bought by one company in a group may or may not be available for use by other companies in the group.

Legal problems also arise in practice with the subject matter of royalty free images.

There is a perennial problem with building releases.  Modern buildings often attract copyright protection, if they can be considered 'original' artistic works.  This is rarely a problem in the UK and in other countries where photographing a building does not infringe the copyright in the building.  But in some continental countries the position is very different.  Collecting societies make demands for substantial infringement damages if an image of a protected building is published without payment of a licence fee.

There is no official register of copyright protected buildings, although unofficial lists of problem buildings are in circulation.  Even more with royalty free than with rights protected licensing, the customer will often assume that all rights in photographic content have been cleared.  In practice this may not be the case.  The small print in the royalty free licence may seek to put the legal onus for clearing such rights onto the customer, but the customer will usually expect the photolibrary to sort out the problem.  Customers buying royalty free images of buildings do not expect to have to pay royalties to the architect.

Similar problems arise with model releases.  Royalty free images are often used for sensitive issues because customers imagine that the images have been model released for absolutely anything.  In practice the position is not always that simple.  A model release form, unless it is very well drafted, may be vulnerable to legal attack if a model finds himself or herself associated with some unsavoury product or campaign.  And there have been cases where libraries have licensed images from photographers who have simply lied about the existence of model releases.  Such issues can create serious problems both for the customer and for the photo library.

Worldwide royalty free revenue has recently been estimated at around $300 million.  It is a small but growing portion of the total image market.  The commercial model has yet to be fully defined and there are still widely held misconceptions amongst customers.  The main message to anyone involved on the receiving end of royalty free licensing is read the small print!

Charlie Swan

 

<< back to articles